ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze the research hotspots and frontiers of hospital research management research from 1981 to 2022.Methods:The relevant literature in the field of hospital scientific research management was retrieved from the CNKI database to explore the trends of publications in this research field. A scientific knowledge graph was drawn and a visualization analysis of the information of authors, issuing units, and research institutions were conducted by Cite Space.5.8.R3.Research hotspots were discussed based on keyword emergence, cluster analysis, and keyword time zone graph.Results:The publication trend in this field was generally policy-oriented, but the cooperation among authors and institutions was relatively loose, and the research hotspots were gradually shifting from scientific research funding management to discipline construction, talent training, translational medicine, and informatization. Cluster analysis found that the main content of hospital scientific research management was scientific research funding and clinical scientific research management and the main management objects were the medical and nursing staff.Conclusions:Hospital scientific research managers must adhere to the policy-oriented approach, strengthen the cooperation and exchanges in scientific research management, innovate the scientific research management mode around the research hotspots and development trends, and promote the quality and efficiency of scientific research management.
ABSTRACT
Objective:The present study was designed to strengthen the education of research integrity, and to improve the awareness of academic misconduct and academic literacy of medical post-graduate students.Methods:A questionnaire survey was conducted with master post-graduate students of a university affiliated hospital, and statistical analysis on the education of research integrity and the perception of academic misconduct among the survey respondents was performed.Results:Academic master post-graduate students′ cognitions of the misconduct in scientific research process and overall academic misconduct were better than that of professional master post-graduate students, and there were significant differences ( P<0.05). The more times of participation in research integrity training, the better cognition of misconduct of scientific research process, research results publication process, and overall academic misconduct, with significant differences ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The education on scientific research integrity of medical post-graduates should be carried out systematically, while the content should be improved and the form should be enriched for scientific research integrity education, so that the medical post-graduates can have a deeper understanding of the code of academic practices, and an education model of scientific research integrity for medical post-graduate which is suitable for China′s national conditions can be gradually developed.
ABSTRACT
Objective:By analyzing the biomedical papers retracted due to the reason that " original data not provided" , to discuss the necessity of preventing scientific data misconduct and the feasible solutions for its management.Methods:Data of the international papers that were published from Jan 2011 to Dec 2021 and retracted due to " original data not provided" were retrieved from Retraction Watch Database. The data of time distribution, institution, journal sources, reasons for retraction, and disciplinary distribution were statistically analyzed and visually processed by using software packages of Excel, Python 3.7, Gephi 0.92.Results:A total number of 529 papers published in the biomedical field were retracted due to " original data not provided" , and the time of publication and retraction occurred mainly in 2019 (27.41%) and 2021 (41.97%). In addition to the reason " original data not provided" used as search term, the reasons for withdrawal were mainly data and image problems caused by scientific data misconduct, and reasons related to the discovery and investigation process of the paper, and these reasons had a strong co-linear relationship. Besides, the 4 disciplinary of biology-cellular, biology-cancer, genetics, medicine-oncology also had a strong co-linear relationship.Conclusions:It is necessary to incorporating scientific research data management into the scientific research code of conduct, strengthen the training on the code of conduct for original scientific research records keeping, establish the scientific research data review mechanism, and promote the prevention and governance of scientific research data misconduct in the biomedical field.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze the main related factors for undertaking the NSFC project among the in-service master and doctor in a third-grade First-class hospital in 2020.Methods:By collecting and comparing the age of the target population, the type of education and degree, SCI papers publication and experience as principal investigator of scientific research projects and other variables, the factors affecting the commitment of the NSFC project were analyzed.Results:A total of 743 feedbacks from the people with master′s degree and doctor′s degree in this survey, 69 of whom had undertaken the NSFC project (accounting for 9.3% of the total number). By the univariate analysis, age, education, age more than 55 years old, professional Dr. and academic Dr., published SCI paper publication, JCR1/JCR2/JCR3/JCR4 publication and experience as principal investigator of scientific research project should significantly improve the opportunity of undertaking the NSFC project. The multivariate analysis results show that the main factors influencing the commitment of the NSFC project are the professional Dr., the academic Dr. and having hosted projects.Conclusions:Professional or academic doctors and experience as principal investigator of scientific research projects have significant advantages in undertaking the NSFC project. Medical institutions should fully consider the advantages of different types of scientific research personnel and make clear their differences in professional fields, in order to develop more targeted programs to improve the capacity for scientific research.
ABSTRACT
Objective To improve the ethics review process and ethical standards,strengthen the implantation of ethical review of research involving human subject in our hospital.Methods Evaluating the review practice of research involving human subject in our hospital practices,learn and bring in the latest international experiences.Results As China's Ethical Committee is in its initial stage,the regulatory ability is still in defective and insufficient.A healthy and operable ethic review mechanism needs to be perfected gradually along with the practice.Conclusions In the aspect of improving the ethical review work of human subject research,some new methods and ideas were discussed.In addition to strengthen the current organizational system,we should clarify the elements of the review of different types of research and carry out multi level ethical trainings.The establishment of a unified,specific evaluative system,combined with this information platform is continuously monitoring the clinical study.This will ensure the human research projects comply with ethical requirements,and further promote the sustainable development of clinical research.